Σαρμα]τικοῦ Γερμανικοῦ Ἁρποκρατίωνος μνήμαις ὁπηνίκα ἐν τῷ Ἀρσινοείτῃ φάσκων ἐν τοῖς κολλητιόνων ἐστὶν ἀμέμπτου ποτε ἐπί τινι ἐπῄνεσας μό̣νους ἐληλυθέναι καὶ νῦν δὲ παρὼν ἀναγυ̣το̣ προκαλούμενος· εἰ μὲν γὰρ ἔχει τις υ̣το̣ν̣ς τι κολλ[ητί]ων ἐγένετο τοῦ δίχα] τινὸς ἁπλῶς μ̣[έ]μ̣ψεως παρελθὼν α ειδ ἀξιοῦ[μ]εν μηδὲν ἐκ τῆς καὶ Τ̣ούρβων εἶ[π]εν· μέμνημαι ὅτι ἐ]π̣ῆλθέν μοι ὁ Διονύσιος καὶ ὅτι ἐκέ- ἐ̣ν̣θάδε μὴ ἄρα τι ἐκ τῆς ζητήσεως ἐὰν π̣ρ̣ὸς αὐτόν τι ἀναφανῇ τελευτῆ- λέλυται ἡ πᾶσα ζήτησις δυνα- νος εἶναι ἐπεὶ καὶ ἐν τῷ μετοξὺ Ἄρειος ῥήτωρ εἶπεν· προγραφῆς τοῦ ὀνόματος κατὰ ῥή]τωρ εἶπεν· φαν̣[ερόν ἐσ]τ̣ι̣
None extracted.
The text discusses the memories of a certain Sarmatic Germanic figure, Harpocration, and mentions a statement made in Arsinoe regarding the collations. It reflects on the nature of a certain inquiry and the presence of Dionysius, who commanded not to derive anything from the inquiry unless something appears towards him. It concludes with a statement about the visibility of the name in the context of rhetoric.